Engineering Feedback

Put a panel of expert engineers on your track.

A mix engineer, a mastering engineer, and an arrangement producer each read your track's measurements against tracks you already respect. Where they agree, you know what to fix first. They tell you exactly how, in plain language.

Here is a real one, start to finish. Play it while you read.

Engineering Feedback for

turquoise by atish, enamour

0:00 / 6:22

Summary

Your track was compared against

PyshTemplar (Newman (I Love) Remix)

Matching on several factors including BPM, danceability, vocals, and more. A 95% match.

Upload your track and pick the reference you are chasing.

Your track is remarkably close to the reference in commercial loudness and low-end translation, but sits lean through the midrange body. Bringing up your melodic instrument levels to fill the scooped 250 Hz to 2 kHz region is the single most critical adjustment to match the reference's tonal weight. Your track already matches the reference in sub-bass mono precision and punchy dynamic delivery, giving you a rock-solid foundation.

What's working

2 agentsPhase-coherent low-end mono compatibility
Mastering EngineerRock-solid low-end mono compatibility

What we found: Frequencies below 200 Hz are exceptionally well-centered with virtually zero stereo phase issues. This guarantees that your sub and low-end punch will translate cleanly and powerfully on club sound systems, mobile speakers, and mono setups.

Issues

This is not one opinion.

One friend's ears can be wrong, or too nice. A panel that agrees is another thing entirely.

Every angle, covered

A mix engineer, a mastering engineer, and an arrangement producer each read the measurements from their own angle. Nothing slips through because one of them happened to miss it.

You see where they agree

When more than one specialist flags the same thing on their own, the report marks it. That is not a matter of taste anymore. That is what to fix first.

Specific enough to act on tonight

Every note names the frequency, the level, and the moment, then tells you the move. No vague "needs more energy." You will know what to open and what to turn.

Measured against the pros

Your track is lined up next to a professional reference, band by band, so the feedback is grounded in how finished music sounds. Not a mood. A measurement.

You keep the lesson

Every finding explains why it matters, so it travels to the next track. Catch it here once, and you hear it yourself from then on.

The receipts.

Every line in that report traces back to a number. Here are the same measurements the panel read, from loudness to low-end masking.

Loudness

Spectral Balance

Stereo Width

Stem Levels

Low-End Masking

Low-End Spectrogram

Low-End Detail (5-250 Hz)

Energy Timeline

Arrangement

Spectrogram

Full-range spectrogram of the analyzed track. Frequency runs up the vertical axis and time along the horizontal, showing how the track's energy is distributed across the spectrum from start to finish.

Your track has a verdict too.

Upload it and see what the panel says. Free to start.

Start Free